I stumbled over this interesting article 'Grotesque film banned day before release date' on the ABC News website. The headline was so attention-grabbing that I just had to find out more about this movie. It turns out that just a day before its screening at the Melbourne Film Festival the film was banned in South Australia. So what could possibly be so horrifying about this movie as to shock its viewers?
According to the Federal Government the film apparently contains sexual violence, scenes of bestiality and highly disturbing pictures that don't seem appropriate to any right-minded audience giving the movie a R18+ rating. Deibert et al. define a R18 level of prohibited content as "material that is likely to be disturbing to those under 18". This doesn't necessarily mean though that the internet wouldn't be able to provide the movie instead. However, according to the Australian Communications and Media Authority an age verification system is required. Interestingly enough the other side of the movie critics does not mind showing this film in public as it was produced legally and simply reveals Serbia's last 15 years of brutal struggle.
The story is well-structured in its body. There is a main introduction about the movie and its opponents followed by some deeper insights of the director of the film festival and an ABC movie critic. This adds colour to the article and keeps the reader interested. On the right side of the article underneath the picture is a link to an audio file about the controversial ban. Again multimedia is used to keep the reader entertained and find out more. The one feature that I personally really like about this article is its 'drop-down' menu up on the top where viewers can share their stories on social networking sites. ABC News definitely stands out from other news providers with an offer of an impressive range of different bookmark sites such as Delicious, Digg, Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter. The website curators must know how to create an appealing wireframe to attract their target audience that utilises the internet to its fullest variety to promote the story.
The headline is punchy and succinct. The picture is a bit boring. Instead they could have used a snapshot from the actual film which does not depict a scene with violence. Also there is no trailer of the movie provided. Obviously it is a pretty brutal film but still, a legal version would have done it just to get a glimpse of the story. How else would one be able to decide wheather to watch the movie?
There is no author to this article which seems kind of odd for a well-respected news channel like ABC. For a story about a film one would also expect some sort of review section where people can discuss about it. ABC News doesn't provide this with this story which is a pity because it is so controversial. The interviewees are well-chosen but to give the story more substantiation and less assumptions an interview with an actual actor or even the director of the movie would have been helpful. Further, there are no tags or links to related stories that would give the reader a higher understanding of the actual plot of the film.
Nonetheless, the article serves its purpose by explaining the controversy behind the film. The site is well-organised in sections and no advertisements are interrupting the reader's view. Besides, user interaction and multimedia are provided to make the story lively.
Online news article:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-18/film-ban/2845452
Deibert, R. et al. (2010). Access controlled: The shaping of the power, rights, and rule in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 391-406.